Every fashion report in the world quotes a price. None of them quotes a cost. The difference is the number of times you actually wear the thing — and once you divide by it, the expensive item is very often the cheap one.
Cost per wear
€1.32
- Wears250
- Upkeep€150.00
- Total spent€330.00
Upkeep adds €150.00 to a €180.00 garment — 83% of what you paid for it, and 10 cleans over its life.
The comparison the tag never shows
A trend top
€25.00
bought for one season, washed at home
- Wears
- 8
- Upkeep
- €0.00
- Per wear
- €3.13
A wool coat
€180.00
five winters, dry-cleaned twice a season
- Wears
- 250
- Upkeep
- €150.00
- Per wear
- €1.32
The coat costs 7.2× the price of the top and 2.4× less per wear — and that is after ten dry-cleans are charged to it. Nothing here is a moral argument about fast fashion. It is division.
The number that decides the answer is the wear count, and it is the one nobody estimates honestly. A garment worn twice has no cost per wear worth calculating; it has a price. If you cannot picture thirty specific occasions for something, the tag price is the cost. Nothing you type here leaves your browser.
The sum
Cost per wear = (price + upkeep) ÷ wears. Upkeep is the part people leave out, and on some garments it is the whole argument: a coat dry-cleaned twice a winter for five winters collects ten cleaning bills, which on the worked example above comes to 83% of what the coat cost in the first place. A jumper you wash at home collects none.
Be honest about the wear count
The wear count decides the answer and it is the input everybody inflates. Some tests that help:
- Name the occasions. If you cannot picture thirty specific times you will wear it, the tag price is the cost. Two wears is not a cost per wear; it is a price.
- Count the season, not the year. A wool coat has maybe five wearable months. Fifty wears a year is already an optimistic winter.
- Something that needs an outfit around it costs more than it says. If the shoes only work with one dress you do not own yet, add the dress.
- Trend-dated pieces expire before they wear out. The question is not how long the fabric lasts but how long you will still reach for it.
What this is not an argument for
Cost per wear is not a licence to spend, and it is not a moral position on fast fashion. It cuts both ways: a €600 coat worn twelve times is €50 a wear and a genuinely bad purchase, while a €25 shirt worn twice a week for three years is about eight cents. Expensive things are not automatically better value — they are only better value if you wear them, and the arithmetic is indifferent to which shop they came from.
It also says nothing about who made the garment or what it cost the person who did. That is a separate question, and a more important one; we cover it in sustainability.
Nothing you type here leaves the browser. Nothing is stored and nothing is sent to us.